EDWARD J. SCHOENBAUM
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
1108 South Grand Avenue
West
Springfield, Illinois
62704-3553
217 524-7836 Fax. 217
524-1221
e.schoen@insightbb.com
Memorandum
March
8, 2006
To:
Members of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod Board
of Directors
From: Edward J.
Schoenbaum
Re: Your
Appointment of a Committee to work toward a resolution . . .
For
those of you who do not know me, allow me to introduce
myself and explain why I write on this important issue
facing our beloved Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod.
A member for over sixty-three years since my infant
baptism at St. Mark's
Lutheran Church in Cleveland, Ohio.
Juris
Doctor from Case-Western Reserve University School of Law in
1968, and B.D in 1970 (converted to an M. Div. after
additional course work) from Concordia Theological Seminary
in Springfield. My
theological training began December, 1965.
When I arrived, J.A.O. Preus, Seminary President
encouraged me to complete my law degree because the church
needed someone with that dual education.
We worked out a program, where I took classes at
Concordia Seminary in Clayton, and St. Louis University
College of Law. Admitted
to practice law in both Missouri and Ohio in 1968.
The summer of 1967, found me back at Case-Western
Reserve Law School while working for the Lutheran Human
Relations Association of America - Cleveland Summer project,
which grew into the very successful Lutheran Metropolitan
Ministry program. After
vicarage, I completed seminary training in Springfield.
During my last year, I worked in the mayor's private law office, and later for the City, County, and State of
Illinois, and was admitted to practice in Illinois. Never ordained because I never requested a call because while
writing my thesis “Equipping Lay People for Ministry in
the World”, we decided example would be better than
preaching.
This
led to being extremely active as a layperson in my local
congregations: as Chair of Social Ministry Committee and
president of Peace Lutheran, Lombard, in suburban Chicago;
and later as Chair of Christian Education, at Trinity
Lutheran, Springfield;
as chair of the Human Care Committee for nineteen
years in the Central Illinois District; and on the Board of
Lutheran Children & Family Services of Illinois, and now
as a Vice President. Also
active in other not for profit organizations in the legal
field, as President of the National Association of
Administrative Law Judges and a full-time administrative law
judge for the State of Illinois since 1987, reviewing legal
arguments of attorneys and writing decisions.
Hopefully,
this memorandum will help you think through your decisions,
and cease your activities before they harm our church even
more than they have already done.
After changing the experienced legal counsel for the
Synod, you have decided not to follow the advice of your new
counsel and are doing what they told you not to do.
Resolving
this lawsuit filed against our duly elected president and
vice president is not the thing to do at this time.
The synod in convention elected him and made many
decisions with which some members of the Board disagreed.
I was at Trinity Lutheran Church in Springfield, when
Rev. Dr. Robert Kuhn, our former District President, who
also appointed me to Chair the Human Care Committee of the
CID, called for a “friendly lawsuit.”
Now as I understand it, he appointed the four member
committee to resolve this lawsuit.
I see him as having a conflict of interest in
appointing the committee.
Since
President Kieschnick, classmate of mine at the seminary, and
Vice President Diekelman, were the named defendants, they
should have more of a say in who would represent them in
resolving the lawsuit against them and the Synod.
As
a certified mediator, I believe in mediation and settlement
of lawsuits where possible.
However, the committee as appointed is clearly not
representing Jerry since it is biased against him and in
favor of the plaintiffs.
In addition, neither a committee nor even the Board
of Directors has the authority to reverse the actions of the
synod in convention, once it has clearly spoken.
It
is totally contrary to the history of the LCMS constitution,
by-laws, and policy to take this action.
Many of us are still waiting for a copy of the Fryer
opinion, promised by Chairman Kuhn before the last
convention that we would get it at the appropriate time.
This breaking of a promise continues to cast a cloud
of suspicion on the current activities of the Board of
Directors.
According
to our bylaws, "The
term synod refers collectively to the association of
self-governing Lutheran congregations initially incorporated
on July 3, 1894. And
presently named The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod and all
agencies of the Synod as defined in Bylaw 3.51 a.
Synod as used herein, is not a civil law entity."
The
way the Board of Directors has interpreted the unseen legal
opinion seems to place them above the bylaws 3.73
Accountability of Officers, Boards and Commissions where it
clearly states: "All
officers, boards, and commissions shall be accountable to
the Synod for all their actions and any decision of such
officers boards, and commissions may be appealed to the
national convention of the Synod."
The
actions of the Board are clearly contrary to the actions of
the synod at its national convention.
In
His Service,
Edward
J. Schoenbaum