Synod Has Had Effective Mission Leadership
By Jonathan Coyne
President Gerald Kieschnick
and First Vice President Bill Diekelman have given great
leadership to helping international mission work of Synod
recover from a downturn and to expand in the last
triennium. Let’s look at the numbers.
A Lagging Indicator
In economics we learn about
leading and lagging indicators. Leading indicators are those
signals indicating an upward or downward movement prior
to the actual change in the economy. Lagging indicators are
those signals appearing after a significant change in
policy and highlighting the upward or downward effect of
that policy.
Mission work is a lagging
indicator highlighting the prior work of leaders in the LCMS.
Mission work requires planning, training, and allocation of
resources to be effective. Jesus noted that we should take
an account of what we need to do prior to entering a battle,
or in this case, entering the spiritual battle of the
mission field.
Gerald Kieschnick became
president of the LCMS in 2001. William Diekelman became
First Vice President of the LCMS in 2004. From 2001-2004,
12 full time missionaries were called into the
international mission field. Similarly, from 2004-2007,
15 full time missionaries were called into the
international mission field. In contrast, from 2007-2010,
42 full time missionaries have been called in over 20
countries of the world! In the last triennium, Synod has
called more than twice the number of missionaries than in
each of the previous two triennia.
According to the numbers, we
would have to conclude that LCMS Mission Services is highly
effective. Our two top Synod leaders have certainly been
mission driven.
A Lagging Economy
I live in Silicon Valley
where the dot-com boom began and ended. During those halcyon
days of high flying stock prices it seemed that everyone
would make money forever. The LCMS saw benefits at that time
as well. From 1997 until 1999 the LCMS received very large
grants from the Schwan Foundation that averaged per year
$4.8 million for missions and $3.8 million for our
seminaries.
However, in 2003 Schwan
Foundation grants to the LCMS were down to $1.6 million for
missions and $1.75 million for the seminaries. This type of
major financial shift made for difficult decisions. Some
will remember when in 2003 many missionaries were called
home due to a lack of funding. From 2004-2008 Schwan
Foundation grants to Synod were up again and averaged per
year $2.2 million for missions and $2.3 million for
seminaries. However, as the economy turned downward once
again, in 2009 Schwan grants dropped to $1.6 million for
missions and $1.8 million for seminaries. We do want
to thank the Foundation for their continued generosity as we
all learn to adjust to sharp downturns in the stock market.
Similar difficulties have
been faced in our congregations. From 2003 until today our
congregations have faced health care costs that have more
than doubled. Many congregations have been forced to cut
their gifts to their districts because of financial
difficulties. Have you witnessed financial stress in your
congregation over those years?
Similarly, districts were
faced with rising costs, but without the offerings of the
past from congregations. Many districts had to lower the
amount of money they could send to the synod.
Finally, the LCMS as synod
was faced with lower offerings from districts and lower
revenue from foundation grants as well as with higher costs
for health care and numerous other items. Just two years
after taking office President Kieschnick faced the 2003
financial crisis that led to calling home so many
missionaries. The economic troubles of 2008-2009 make 2003
look mild. Yet Synod leaders have reversed the trend,
sending out twice as many missionaries as before. How was
this accomplished?
A Vibrant Mission Department
LCMS Mission Services
responded to the crisis of 2003 in many creative ways.
First, they began to connect
the mission efforts of the LCMS to individuals and
congregations. Short-term mission opportunities allowed
pastors, congregations, and lay people to participate in
foreign missions for short term assignments. When these
people returned, they were different. They shared the joy of
bringing the message of Jesus into a foreign country or
culture. They encouraged others to see the power of the
Gospel and to give of their time, talent and treasure. This
created a large base of people and congregations who were
willing to support mission work through special offerings
and gifts.
The
international budget for missions has increased over the
past three years because of God’s grace and the stewardship
of God’s people. The three-year increase is 15% or $1.5
million more for the work of the Lord. Years of effort has
changed our view of the mission field, our ability to
participate in mission work, and our willingness to support
missions.
A More Efficient and Effective Method
Prior to the financial
challenges of 2001-2003, Synod attempted to bring
international students over to our American seminaries and
we sent American missionaries to countries with the goal of
building one or more mission stations in a community. The
majority of internationals who came to our seminaries were
unable to do effective mission in their home country. Some
wanted the stay in the United States, while others struggled
for acceptance when they did return.
American missionaries had
been sent into foreign countries to start churches. A
better strategy is to use them to help start and develop a
whole church body there.
Consider our work in
Venezuela, which began in 1951. Faithful missionaries began
19 rural parishes, but there were never enough pastors. Rev.
Ted Krey arrived in 2001 and implemented a new model of
leadership development with veteran missionary Rev. Rudolph
Blank. From 2008 through 2009, 13 internationals were
ordained in Venezuela, bringing the total to 19 men serving
all of the rural parishes for the first time ever. By
empowering our trained clergy to teach leaders in foreign
countries, we are able to multiply our efforts, and to help
partner denomination multiply their church planting efforts.
In other words, our
missionaries no longer leave with a goal to plant one
congregation, but to plant a church body that will expand.
We no longer bring one man to our seminary, but send one
trained man to be the seminary in that place to train many
men. This change in emphasis allows our mission department
to be more effective and more efficient as good stewards of
God’s gifts.
National and International Missions
Originally the Blue Ribbon
Task Force for Synod Structure and Governance (BRTFSSG)
proposed a change from program boards to a pair of advisory
commissions for national and international missions. The
resolution coming to the convention now provides for a
national and an international board for missions. It is
exciting to see that the delegates through their regional
meetings bring “grassroots” solutions to the process of
modifying our governance and structure.
However, the most important
part of the new emphasis is a broadened understanding of
“mission.” Perhaps many still see our own country as
something other than a mission field. I cannot do that,
living in Silicon Valley, where less than 10% of all people
attend ANY Christian church in a week. In many parts of our
country we see less expression of Christian faith than many
parts of Africa, Russia, and South America. Our LCMS leaders
are helping us understand that all of our work is about the
mission of Jesus Christ to bring saving faith to all people
through God’s Word and the sacraments of Baptism and Holy
Communion. We need to refocus on the fact that we are all
missionaries at home and in foreign countries.
A Comparison
On June 5 John Wooden passed
from this life into the glories of heaven. For those people
who do not follow college basketball, John Wooden was the
most successful college basketball coach of all time. He led
UCLA to a remarkable 10 national championships, twice the
number of any other coach and 7 championships in a row. I
was watching the tribute show because an LCMS member from my
congregation was a dear friend of John and helped him get
his job at UCLA. I was surprised by one fact – John Wooden
did not win a championship for the first 16 years of his
coaching career. In fact, he was nearly fired after a season
when he almost lost more games than he won.
Can you imagine what would
be missing at UCLA if the regents had decided to replace
Coach Wooden with a new coach? The legacy of which they are
most proud would never have happened.
President Gerald Kieschnick
and First Vice-President William Diekelman have been serving
for 9 and 6 years respectively. They have led in a very
difficult economic and social context. Some other large
church bodies have split or are on the verge of splitting.
Yet during these trying times, our leaders have not only
held the church together, but they have created a peace
which has led to more mission starts and more support from a
broad base of God’s people.
We stand at the moment in
history when we can support our veteran leaders and see that
a drop in support from districts has been balanced by the
foresight of our leaders that is bringing an increase in
direct gifts to mission work. More importantly, the LCMS,
which is often called A Sleeping Giant, seems to be waking
to the fact that all of us are missionaries and all of us
can help bring the message of salvation to a world in
desperate need of the Gospel.